Showing posts with label Shanghai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shanghai. Show all posts

Thursday, 20 October 2011

Shanghai Journal: 10/14

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota




Tennis seems to be so boring without Djokovic and Federer these days. Agree or not but Murray doesnt have that charisma that Federer/Nadal has brought to the table and to a certain extent Djokovic these days with his funny personna. No doubt, organisers want them to play. My favorite thesedays is Djokovic for his unbelievable streak this year and the way he has sweated it out to do the unthinkable.
If you want to read, here is a good article i found while surfing the net for exciting tennis coverage: http://bit.ly/qTlozk : Djokovic and His Success Secret: Worth reading!

djokovic n federer be back soon...they are camping in cornwall.

@ Sandy:
or r u Chris or Christina or Apeksha .....????
You are back again with your "blah blah blah..i was surfing the net and found this interesting article....."

Posted by Matt - Allez, Roger! Come on, Serena!

Everything is so boring without Roger and Novak.

Now do we realize how important it is for us to appreciate Roger while he's here? The game simply won't be the same without him.

We'd be better off just handing Andy the trophy right now.

Matt, don't be so fast handing Murray the trophy. Kei is red hot, and either spaniard will be capable of winning the title on Sunday. Fed is getting old and less motivated, no matter he says. Sooner or later, we will have to do without him.

only whiners like to whine about fed because fed is the king of the whiners. artists do not trump great competitors except in the loser/whiner's eye.

Is there a repeat function on this site where I can just say, "Great writing, Steve, loved it" over and over again? :)

Late late late but I love these notebook posts. :)

Windowgate. LOL.

Shallow I realise but the sheer physical beauty of a Lopez-Ferrer semi-final will draw me in. :)

i would love to see Nishikori win his semifinal match later. It would be very interesting 2012 for Asian players.

Thank you for praising Nishikori's tennis. He finally came out from tragic injury. Nishikori played at his best against Dolgopolov and showed his fun and smart tennis to the world.

Sadly in Japan, tennis popularity has declined so much that there is not much coverage about tennis any more.

Nishikori is the only hope for tennis fans.

nishikori has a nice game - efficient technique and now good tactics as well. a nice combo of bollettieri and gilbert, like come to think of it - agassi. and he's a good competitor too - great heart and never-say-die attitude.

good to see him fulfilling his potential and especially as the lone good asian in the lone asian master's tourney. he may surprise us today ..

it is boring without Novak around to amaze us. Wish I'd seen Ferrer's last couple of matches, though.

Kei is exciting. Both men are hitting widely, wildly.

Steve, I think I know the very school with screaming kids you mean. Last night two neighbors of mine were complaining about that very thing. They do sound like it's a break at the Screaming Banshee Academy.

Tallboyslim...kindly IGNORE @chris/apeksha/sandy...
maybe,then,he/she will stop posting that link and stop "irritating" you!

Interesting that Mayer was sick in his match against the other Flo. That, plus the toll of taking an extra large scalp, probably was enough to do him in. Even against Pretty Boy Flo.

nice write up. Wish I'd seen Kei-Dolgo instead of watching Florian Mayer (formerly of Kraftwerk) have an off day. David may not be exciting, but he's as tough as they come, and he deserves a big title. As much as I love Murray and prefer his tennis, I want Ferru to win tomorrow.

since you mentioned challenge 'ethics', there was a moment in the Feli-David match when David successfully challenged a call despite a "that was totally out" raised hand from Feli. The commies were divided as to how innocent Feli's gesture was (fwiw, I give him the benefit of the doubt, and I don't even really like him).

also, for anyone who was confused by the reference to Florian's artistic past (don't let the surname fool you)
http://covers.a-go.in/max/kraftwerk_-_1973_ralf_und_florian.jpg

tennis in japan will become more popular with your new project45 bloke.

***oh dear those federer / djokovic withdrawal symptoms are getting worse for some of you... theyll be back soon...any news on djokovic back strain ??.

"Now do we realize how important it is for us to appreciate Roger while he's here? The game simply won't be the same without him."

I've been saying the same thing for the last four years, but people were too much in love with Nadal. Baaad mistake. Huge.

I have not missed Roger so much, as I missed Novak playing in China. Tennis is not the same without Djokovic and his charisma.

Lillian

I have not missed. anybody in Asia but I missed the best game of Nadal
Please Nadal, come back soon, the tennis looks different and boring when you don't play your best!!!!!!


View the original article here

Shanghai Journal: 10/11

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota




Nice to know you can see for miles and miles.

Its kinda funny how at the beginning of the the year the next wave of young talent seemed so far from being all gathered near or in the top 50, but here they all are getting direct entry except for Harrison who had to qualify this time, and Berankis who is back on the challenger tour, slowly coming back from injury.

What I like about Raonic today was that he is always looking to be agressive, but I saw that Llodra actually had more winners in the stats than Raonic did, so while Llodra is overall more consistent and puts what appears to be effortless volleys in hard to reach places, Raonic is forcing errors with his power, but more so on the important points than Llodra is able to do. And yeah, the muted celebration is a little creepy, but Raonic just seems to be saying, "I got a lot of work to do if I want to get my matches over in 2 sets."

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature)

hey Philip, did you see the post I left you on the Deuce Club in answer to a couple of questions you had?

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature)

Are we in the post-Djokovic phase already?

grigor dimitrov has every shot going but he still gets confused, he could be a bit like federer if he sorts his head out also.

yay, Milos,

I like how business like these young guys like Raonic and A-Tomic are; maybe Ryan Harrison could take a page from their book?

Annie said, "Philip, if you're still around, who are your faves and how did you get interested in tennis - how did you find TW?"

Sorry Annie, I didn't get back to the Deuce post because there are over ten pages of comments but I found your questions. It was 1983 and I was watching Yannick Noah win the French Open. From that point on I liked Noah, then waited over a decade for Ivanisevic to win Wimbledon. Now I am waiting for another French player to win a slam. Being Canadian, I like what I am seeing in Raonic's game a lot and would like him to be the next 'American' to win a slam. I found a link to Tennisworld from the old Tennisweek website and like to comment when the thread is pretty consistent. Ironically, I just feel that when the post is about having new people comment and then the comments after a few hours are way off topic it kind of discourages new people from commenting. I am not really concerned about being a known commentator but just like it when the comments are on topic and my comments fit in the thread.

if a tennis ball us struck in a stadium and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

Yeah d, the stadium seems pretty empty for a masters. Maybe they should give some tickets away to promote the event.

I watched the Roddick-Dimitrov match. Dimitrov should have won the second, as he was playing really well at the beginning of that set. Overall, I thought Roddick played well enough. I wish he would flatten out his forehand more. Over the years, he has definitely become more "conservative" with that shot.

semi otter face = the atomic tomic.


View the original article here

Shanghai: Murray d. Nishikori




Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


FIRST YYYYYYYYYEEEEEEeeeeeeeerHHH


Really can't see past murray for this one. He's playing well and full of confidence and has the incentive of defending his title to become world number 3.


Its a shame for Ferrer as I really think that he deserves a masters and would love to see him win one, but on this surface and murray's serve working so well this week I just ca't see it.


I hope its a good match and not a one sided affair like their last encounter.


whose not who's


whose is the possessive, who's is a contraction of who is


i would be surprised if ferrer wins a set 2moro 3 staright 3 setters,he will be tired and his ruthless consistancy against murray on hardcourts simply does not work (but on clay it does),overall murray deserves to be no3 looking over the whole year,his wins for the year would be over 65 wins had he played anywhere near his best in rotterdam,indian wells,miami and montreal


feel sorry for ferrer at his very best on claycourts but has to deal with rafa and now djokovic and previous federer,on hardcourts his best slam performences(semi us open 2007,aussie open this year).murray will win 6-4 6-3


hope he goes unbeaten until the end of the year,would set up next year perfectly(novak repeat?)


I'm yet to see a match where Nishikori has been impressive. I stopped watching when the score was 4-0 in the second set.


Gosh is Murray hot when he has no competition. Beating up on guys ranked outside the top 100 or top 50, wow is he amazing. Where was his game in the Australian Open final, or in any of the other three Slam semifinals he lost to Nadal this year, where the results were never in doubt, he never even managed to make it close.


For a player as highly ranked as he is, you've got to credit Murray with some of the most boring Grand Slam play in history. What was the last memorable Grand Slam match Andy Murray played? Somehow I can't remember...


It is rather interesting in fact: Murray had really solid results in Slams this year: one final and 3 semifinals, so one can say he played well and showed great consistency. But none of the matches he played were memorable, earth-shattering, represented upsets, were even beautiful to watch or were memorable in any way.


By contrast, Federer had weaker results in Slams this year, one final, 2 semifinals, and one quarterfinal but three of his matches were actually rather remarkable and memorable: the win over Djokovic in Paris, the loss to Djokovic in New York having 2 matchpoints, and even his loss to Tsonga at Wimbledon was something that one cannot forget easily. His performances even when he lost are not forgettable, Murray's are.


maria shut up murray ran into federer in 2 grand slam finals and he was playing brilliant then he came up against djokovic who started the greatest year in history murray came closer to beating him than nadal has oh and by the way he came close against nadal on clay 1 break each set he took the 1st against nadal at wimbledon and won 1 at the us open and i remember murray being 2 sets and 3-0 up against nadal when he retired "injured" because he knew he was away to get bagled and he beat wawrinka top 20 nishikori is in the top 50 and he beat nadal last sunday hes world number 2 considering he beat nadal with a bagel in the 3rd set with rafa winning 4 points he has been playing well he also beat ferrer in the semis and will do so again tomorrow so be quiet


Hey Ryan,


Murray was playing brilliant in the Slam finals with Federer??? How many sets did he win?


With Djokovic this year: well maybe Djokovic got started on his successful year because Murray offered as much competition in that AO final as I would have offered. How about you view it like this? Murray is Djokovic's direct peer and he failed to put any pressure on Djokovic, he played terrible and lost almost all sets by two-break margins. Not even one set was competitive!


In his encounters with Nadal this year Murray was not routed, it's true, as he managed to win a couple of sets overall, and made some sets competitive, but he was never close. Federer was close to winning in his US Open semifinal loss to Djokovic, for example, in case you don't know the meaning of the word "close".

Posted by Roddick fan from Virginia

Good win by Andy. Hope he repeats tomorrow.


Maria has an axe to grind....I like Murray. He's a talented, capable player with a varied game. His personality might be a bit of an acquired taste, but the world would be boring if all the players were as square as Roger ;).


I think Murray will win a slam at some point. It's just timing.


well,Andy has a hidden talent who is coming to the fore now!!give him a break!!he is going to 2win a grand slam soon !


Wow... Ferrer has stunningly gorgeous green eyes.


Murray routed Ferrer last week - and really Andy Roddick should have won their match but he played so passively. Murray has really stepped up with the right balance of offense and defense.


Murray might still be lacking some weapons to win a slam but he is on the right track. Up until a couple of years ago he made hard work beating players outside the top 50 thus tiring himself before reaching the big guns. Now he is playing like a top player, disgarding "low" ranked players quickly, thus keeping more reserves for when it matters.
I think his result at the ATP finals in London will tell if he is ready for a Major next year. Does he finally develop a couple of weapons in his game to dictate and win against the top 8 in the world? Could make for some fun tennis if he does.


that JAP is trying to play like the phoney #1 on the WTA but it only work for a few games because the ATP is where the real pros play not like the women who should pay tto play.


Go get it Murray!
future number 3 ATP !!

Posted by Matt - Allez, Roger! Come on, Serena!

"but the world would be boring if all the players were as square as Roger ;)."


HA! That gave me a good laugh.


Murray draws about as much attention to a room as I do.

Posted by Matt - Allez, Roger! Come on, Serena!

Something tells me that all of the Djokovic, Nadal and Murray fans will indirectly miss Roger when he retires. Will their men's semi final and final wins in grand slams be even remotely as significant when they beat, say, Ferrer or Soderling? I think not.


As a Fed fan, I really do hope that Murray takes the number 3 ranking and Roger becomes #4. I'd much rather see Roger face Nadal in grand slam semi finals than Novak who can't lose right now. Plus, it'll just confirm how far below Murray is from the top 3 guys.


Matt: Roger can't beat Rafa so I don't know what's so desirable about that match up for some Federer fans. At least against Djokovic he has a better chance of winning and the matches are more competitive.

Posted by Matt - Allez, Roger! Come on, Serena!

wilson,


of course Rafa was going to win on clay, but if we look back at Roger's last win over Nadal it was less than 11 months ago and they've only played 3 times during those months.


Maria if you dont like a particular player dont make a point of posting on their racket reactions it comes across as pathetic.


Memorable Murray matches this year: escaping from two sets down against robin haase in New York. The final against Nadal last week.


In general: Atp final round robin stage win over federer. 2 sets and a break down win over gasquet - wimbledon. I cant remember loads but I know there are more.


Murray has had an amazing year full stop. No if and or buts.


great point jason maybe she will remember this French Open 2011 2 sets down to victor troicki got it bk to 2 sets all 5-2,30-0 down in the final set and he still won


Be honest, it is probably more fun to watch Sampras Mcenroe play now than Murray Ferrer. I guess in a few years we will have Nadal and Federer in the lineup...The mens' game is dull...there ought to be more talent ibn the world of mens tennis but there just isnt...when djokovic finally falls apart physically murray may find himself number one...that is how much a piece of crap mensd tennis is.


Matt: Miami was on HC and Rafa won, his victories over Roger are not exclusively on clay.


I think it´s finaly time for one of the Grand Slams to be played indoor on a fast to semi-fast surface and with a LOW BOUNCE! There are sooooooo many players that are in a gigantious and unfair disadvantage because they have played most of their upbringing indoors because of the climate!


Why should all the Grand Slams be played outdoors with its slow surface and very high bounce??!! It benefits some players (read: all the claycourters etc.)in a really UNFAIR way! Indoor-tennis, with its perfect conditions (no wind, no sun, fair temprature provides the best tennis (because of its perfect conditions.


I remember last years semifinal-match (Paris Masters) between Robin Soderling vs Michael Llodra; one of the best matches of the year (if not the best) becuase of the different styles that clashed. Soderling´s baseline (which 99,9999999% of all the players play) and Llodra with his fantastic net-rushing-attacking-tennis!


So PLEASE, make one of the Grand Slam-tournaments an indoor-event with a fast surface with LOW bounce!!!!!!!!!


View the original article here

Shanghai Journal: 10/13

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota




I think Pete, what you have said is completely true that Ferrer's position is enviable. He is not succeeding like his counter part but definitely he is making up his life and trying his best!. He has no pressure and enjoying his game. I come and read your article regularly and am a constant fan and through this I cam across this also (http://bit.ly/nQAplv). This article also summarises the same that in life, tennis records will be broken and you might not achieve your goals but its important to try for your goals and make your life! Nice reading!

Sorry it should be steve. Read Pete's article before urs so somehow didnt realise wrote his name.

Nonetheless, Good article Steve!

@arnie
(or r u Chris or r u Apeksha ???)
You tried harder this time. You did not post a one-liner. You made more conversation. But your goal was the same ....to send us to some motivatinal tennis blog.
I ask you again....r u trying to use this forum to advertise and get more hits for ur blog ????

i have to google matthew ebden...

That line about being No. 6 instead of No. 1 -- and still getting the dough -- is oh so terribly cynical. I think any player who has worked as hard as Ferrer would love to get to No. 1 for any amount of time and/or win a Grand Slam and take all the good and bad that comes with it. And be talked about more than just that guy who hit the ball at the baby.

As Billie Jean King wisely once said: Pressure is a privilege.

I did like your bricklayer analogy, though.

"The courts in Shanghai and Paris are quicker than those used at the other 1000s"

Isn't Cincinnati faster than Shanghai?

@arnie

Here are some examples that have prompted me to believe that you use ultiple names and comments to point us (deceptively) to you blog. Let me be clear, I don't have any problems abt it. I just think you do it in an underhanded way. Just come up and be honest.

----------------------------------------------------
Posted by Chris 10/12/2011 at 03:53 PM

Talking about Sampras and Federer, here is a good one:
http://bit.ly/nQAplv (Federer, Sampras and Emerson-The Myth of Invincibility)

Makes you realise that noone including Nadal and Djoker can remain invincible!


Posted by chrissie 10/03/2011 at 11:18 PM

IF murray needs to win , I think he needs to learn to contorl his temperament. Maybe tis can help him to win or grab no3:
http://bit.ly/qhjpaO
I hope murray somehow gets to read this article so that he can get motivated to defeat Nadal!


Posted by Christine 09/30/2011 at 01:11 PM

Very nice article indeed Steve.I agree that it might not be the greatest but its one of the most unexpected year. nobody in their dreams must have thought at the start of the year that he will be able to beat Nadal and Federer so consistently. his streak really amazes me and the kind of person he has transformed into. From the angry Djoker, we are seeing a more matured and responsible Djoker plus he is funny too at times! A sign of a maturing person. His temperament has also improved so much : i think this has also been a major reason why he has been able to win. he is calm even when he is losing:

Here is a nice article on his temperament and how murray can laso learn from it: http://bit.ly/paCkWk


Posted by Kane 09/29/2011 at 05:36 PM

i think Murray should focus on controlling his temper rather than clendar issues and prize money. Nadal says it-its understandable but Murray really? You need to focus on winning first GS for your country and not on this dude:
No wonder people have started to write about you and and your temper:
Anger: Difference between Good (McEnroe,Murray) & Great (Federer,Nadal) http://bit.ly/paCkWk

get a hold of yourself otherwise you will go down as player who never won a GS!

Posted by Chris 09/22/2011 at 02:57 PM

There was so much bad going around in US Open this year. I just wonder whats happened to US tennis, we used to have so many great players and examples int he form of Agassi, Sampras. But now we have players like Serena and lot who have set bad examples for the kids to follow. I was watching it with my family and what a let down it was to see that this is the standard they want their followers to follow- very very bad. In this age, where people follow wha their role models do , we need motivation and inspiring stuff. Here is anotheer article which i make my kids also read which cast a positive shadow on tennis: Juan Martin Del Potro - Fall and Rise of the fighter? http://bit.ly/owcb66

Its articles like these that kids need to read so that they can also get motivated and not watch players like serena, roddick!


Posted by pete 09/20/2011 at 09:04 PM

I think Delpotro will take Argentina to victory this year and we will see a new chapter in tennis written again next year. Although people havent given him much credit to him since his return but slowly and slowly he is returning back in form: My & argentinas hero: http://bit.ly/owcb66

HE rocks and is my fav for next year!
----------------------------------

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature)

loved the bricklayer analogy, steve. and especially for Ferru who briefly worked construction.

Am I happy about Rafa losing to Mayer? No. But I didn't think he played badly. (he even made an overhead!) And Mayer played SO well. He is, after all, ranked 23 in the world. Weird, because I don't think I've ever seen him play. I hope Murray wins the whole thing. Want him to have confidence going into the new season.

I thought it was interesting that when asked about Paris, Rafa was non-committal. All he said was that the season was long for him. So I dont' expect to see him in Paris.

Boy, Tallybolly, you have kept up with this well. I generally ignore these links because I have enough reading to do with tennis.com and plenty other news websites.

ido not agree with you about rafa i do not think he wanted to win.just getting another one of his 1000 series out of the way.he will be on his way home now or out making more money from someone.

Fernando says "The Tignor" is The Jerry Izenberg/Jay Greenberg of Tennis writers.

What does that mean? The Tignor knows. Fernando!

"It’s too bad no one really cares about the fall Masters events"

I care.

"the net, despite the power and spin of the modern ground stroke, is still there for the taking."

And that's one of the reasons why I care: I get to see players exploit quicker courts and bring more variety to the game. Llodra last year in Paris, and in Shanghai Dolgopolov, Mayer and Tomic, while Nishikori benefits from being able to make placements into shots that are forcing on these courts, but only rally extenders that sit up on slower courts.

Anyone who bemoans homogeneity on the men's tour, even a little, should be calling for a retreat from slooooowww courts and heavy balls. Fears that the game would revert to serve, serve, serve & volley, and serve, have been proven wrong (Llodra didn't win Paris, after all). But man, is it more fun to watch a contrast of styles or what?

Do I think the ATP will take this and encourage more tournaments to have quicker courts? Nah. But the fall Masters events still matter, if only to me and the guys trying to make the cut for London.

Another huge advantage of being the no. 6 or no. 12 guy -- you get plenty of rest just when you need it most. And you actually get a chance to work on a few things, if only for a day or three. Still, it beats the heck out of having to fly out of one hub to another and get back on the court in 24 to 48 hours, with too little rest, too little sleep, a mental hangover and sore joints and muscles, only to remember that you had the awful good fortune of winning the event last year so you have a ton of points to defend. Lovely. Yeah, no. 6 ain't such a bad spot to be in.

And this, "tennis's bricklayer," was brilliant.

On another note, I see Bored Poet has returned... as Fernando.

And my friend skip1515 makes a very cogent point about the beauty of the fall campaign on faster hard courts, where players are more often rewarded for venturing inside the service line and putting their fortunes in their own hands.

You'd think Nadals match was the only upset. Ebden did alright too...

"Plus, Mayer played great. [...] Mayer, 28, has always been fatally streaky, and has always had much more game than his results would indicate. Who else can do as many different and strange things on a tennis court—from two-handed volleys to jumping backhands to jumping drop shots—yet make them all fit together smoothly?"

Steve - agree with your observations and thoughts about the match, and I'm glad you took some time to focus on the guy who won. The above quote kind of sums up why I always try to catch Florian's matches, even though they so often end in disappointment and frustration. It was so nice to see it all come together for him for the duration of a match aginst a big opponent on a fairly big stage. Maybe sleep deprivation enhanced my excitement, but what an entertaining display of tennis that was.

and yes (even if I don't love how you presented the #1 vs #6 issue), Ferru as "tennis' bricklayer" is pretty great. I heart that guy so much.

“... that poor old beat-up over-30-year-old Juan Carlos Ferrero...” Wow, how generous of you, Steve! And how about that cheap and simplistic take on Ferrer’s career? I wish you had stopped and thought twice before writing it; for someone who sees philosophical depth in everything Nadal says or does, I am surprised you fail to spot the tragedy in Ferrer’s case. I guess he was aiming for more than just the #6 or the dough back in Australia in January. And for the sake of accuracy: not everybody expects Nadal to win every tournament he enters. ‘cause it’s autumn, no?? And no, I don’t think the internet would blow up if Nadal lost a set to Ferrero. Because Nadal just lost two sets to Florian Mayer and the internet is still only pondering if it should read anything into it. “Nah, it just wasn’t his day!” concludes someone. Let’s not pretend at least that the standards aren’t double, because we all know they are.

never thought i'd ever hear the word "smoothly" when someone is talking about anything related to F. Mayer.

Way to go, Flo.
More of this please and maybe i will watch you again in the future.

It is becoming clear that nadal's game is going down hill.At this rate he will loose to DELPO in DAVIS CUP and may not be in the top ten in 2012.

"never thought i'd ever hear the word "smoothly" when someone is talking about anything related to F. Mayer."

lol - I like him, but I know what you mean; no one used that word today, that's for sure :(

The weird energy stuff is hilarious...I think Murray needs to start the match in straight up freak mode...come out first point with his hair all jacked up, no shirt, cursing, absolutely lose it on his first error, just totally weird out his opponent...get it all out then start playing like an Englishman...I'd love to see it...I always think Murray is just one point away from complete meltdown mode whether it's going good or not and his shirt tugging is funny stuff...just rip off the damn thing and get it over with!

Come on Federer and Djokovic!!!! We need you!

" becoming clear that nadal's game is going down hill.At this rate he will loose to DELPO in DAVIS CUP and may not be in the top ten in 2012.


he may lose to Delpo in DC but I think it will take longer than 2012 for him to drop out of the top ten. Maybe 2013 January?

I think Fernando is a female from the U.S. Steve Holt!

@gupta: Nadal going downhill? Debatable. Out of top 10 in 2012??? His 2011 record is 65-12. He hasn't been lower than #4 since 2005 (before he won his first French). The Djoker owns him right now, but he owns the whole bloody Tour. I suppose that you felt the same way about Federer a couple years ago when the chinks in his armor first appeared. But there he is, 30 yrs old and still in top 4.


View the original article here

Shanghai: Murray d. Ferrer




Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I enjoy your writing very much, Hannah. I also enjoyed what I saw of this match. I'd love to see Murray win a major next year


Good to see Murray winning. Congrats!


I am a fedfan but we truly appreciate the achievements of Murray. 25/26 is a achievement next only to djoker in this era of highly competitive tennis. He has really played well and there is no doubt in my mind that he will win a slam very soon. Congrats once again and well played.


Congrats to Murray! He was lucky he wasn't playing Djokovic or Federer in the final, or he would have lost pretty easily, in my opinion. He needs to do better. He's got time to improve his game before the Aussie Open. Andy, please be more aggressive, offensive. You won't beat the Djoker by playing your baseline game, because that is his style of play, and he's baseline play is better than yours. You need to go to the net more. And fix that second serve! Make it more effective. If the Djoker can make radical changes to his game in a matter of several months, so can you! C-mon! Let's go. You're on a roll now! No time for complaints. Hopefully, this latest string of successes will give you the confidence you need to beat the Big 3 in the future.


HW, I scrolled down to the byline before finishing the first sentence to see if this was you. Your excellence is unmistakable, please keep it up.


Hannah - it's a real boon for you - and your contributions here - with Andy playing well and winning.


I was hoping Ferrer would get his first MS, but I'm very curious to see if Murray gets some positive reinforcement from being #3.


I will find this on ESPN3 replay, since I was asleep. But he beat Ferrer from the baseline?!


I am a Djokovic fan, but I would like to see Murray win the Australian Open in January. I think he has a pretty good chance.


I'd most like to see Murray win Wimbledon; as a fellow Djokovic fan I'm hoping he defends the title in Melbourne.


beautifully written ... the whole way through I kept wondering, "who could this be?, it's SOOO good", but I didn't peek at the name until I finished it. just a great piece, thanks.


as for the meaning of AndyM's Asia - 0 tear, my fear has been that he's peaking too soon for the AO, and as George H sang, "what is sweet now turns so sour" - ie if he gets himself beaten up in the early rounds there, runs into rafa or novak, fights valiantly and comes in second, this will all seem worse than pyrrhic.


but here's hoping I'm being a Cassandra and this is in fact the jump start to Murray's first major success.


Congrats Murray! You can continue winning if you can cultivate that aggressiveness and offensiveness. Avoid same old rythym of baseline game as far as possible and improve and demonstrate your courage by going to net always and you will be all the more successful. Take to YOGA and gain mental strength and concentration. Always say " I HAVE NO FEAR AND I AM BOLD ". Practice YOGA-ASANAS and Breathing exercises. YOGA is not a RELIGION. It is a perfect tested science to achive tremendous physical and mental fitness to acieve success in any endeavour. Trust the science and your fan. Remember that you have to play with Djokovic & Federer in the near future. You should not loose as you have many weapons to win. GVK. Sharma.


It's funny how Murray is often criticized for not having a go-to shot in the big moments but this match showed he's still closer to having that than Ferrer will ever be. Ferrer was the better player through the first set of this match and for the beginning of their AO semi match but in both cases there wasn't a doubt Murray could hit next gear and grab the lead.


It's not even worth thinking about AO because it's so far away. It's a fun stretch, maybe it will translate to more but the fact he got past Federer in the rankings was the goal. He cannot rest on this streak but he's probably felt he's been running in place the last three years, like Novak did when he was #3 for years.


Yoga has been a major factor in the transformation of Djokovic, but few have paid attention to that, since gluten became a better story, I guess.


But winning begets winning, and a run like this will be great for him going forward to Basel or Bercy and the 02.


"If Masters titles were awarded on the basis of hard work and dogged defiance, David Ferrer would have at least one by now..."
so true, but all credit to Murray for his recent string of successes and being the better player today. GVK Sharma, Andy's not a stranger to yoga, although IIRC, it was specifically Bikram he was doing, and he may have had a more limited goal of increased flexibility, rather than the mental aspects you are touting.
lovely RR, as per usual :)

Posted by Nam1 (in a Rafa funk)

Nice writing, HW.


I like the line about:


"If Masters titles were awarded on the basis of hard work and dogged defiance, David Ferrer would have at least one by now..."


Congrats to MAndy fans ... hugs for Ferrer fans.


Though a Fed KAD, I'm getting use to the ever increasing negative milestones ... they were bound to rear their ugly heads sooner or later. MAndy deserves to be #3 at this time ... that's a fact. ;)


Does anyone know the exact ranking points for the Top 4, come Monday?


Should be like this:
Novak Djokovic SRB 13860
Rafael Nadal ESP 10375
Andy Murray GBR 7825
Roger Federer SUI 7780


Maybe this is the year Murray breaks through and gets a major. I must confess that when I saw him win the juniors at the Open I dismissed him as as a scrawny basher who was lucky to win. Another one of my great tennis predictions! Still Davy is one of the most entertaining players to watch. He just never gives up and I love his unwavering concentration. And for a small guy using the same power as the big guys he is rarely injured.


I am bummed to see Fed fall to #4. I still think he's better than Murray, who has great skills but has such negative body language on the court.


Murray can only win slam when there is no FED,NADAL and Djokovic. and Even after Fed, Nadal and djoko retirement Murray cant beat the likes of Delpo, berdych and tsonga in a major. so Dear Murray forget about winning slam. U can only win ATP tournies

Posted by Matt - Allez, Roger! Come on, Serena!

Only 100 points? Pfft no biggie for Rog. Although Fed has champion points to defend in Basel and London, if we look ahead to next year he has almost nothing to defend even from the beginning of the year. Murray's got the AO final to be worried about. No need to panic!


and this concludes my random thoughts on yoga and tennis.
Namaste


As a Fed fan I would like Murray to go to the top 2, that would potentially make Roger's chance of winning a GS better. Roger has no chance of beating Rafa and Nole back to back in 5 setters to win a GS.
Lets see how the top 4 play in London.


"Only 100 points? "


Actually it's only 45. But I never remember last year's post-Open results or how one or the other might increase points.


Normally the asterisk is only brought out for Grand Slams, but let's make an exception here before we get carried away with Murray mania. A small part of the asterisk is the absence of Novak and to a lesser extent Federer (because we know Murray owns Federer in the best of 3 format). The largest part of the asterisk is because Rafa certainly wasn't at 100% in this tournament. It is close to being an absolute truth that Murray cannot compete with any success against a healthy Rafa. Put it this way, if Murray can't win in the absence of the big two (Rafa, Novak) and the fading big guy (Fed)then something is wrong with Murray.


tt - Roger's still better than Murray - certainly when the chips are down, and for the Maestro, in terms of rankings, it's #1 and everything else. which befits a great champion. the problem with Murray's goal of being #3 is that its a terrific high-water mark for a very good but not quite great player. so if that's what he wants to be when he grows up, he's there. the other 3 wanted and got more. it won't be long till we find out if AndyM is really in their league or just someone for them to routinely beat in late stage GS matches.


"He was lucky he wasn't playing Djokovic or Federer in the final, or he would have lost pretty easily, in my opinion"


eh what? have you only been watching tennis for 10 months? He just defended the title that he won a year ago by beating Federer in straight sets in the final. He's got a 25 wins out of last 26 matches record by being the only one to beat Djokovic in a final this year. He's the only player other than Federer to push Djokovic at all this year (re: Rome). Not even Nadal has been that close, just because he made slam finals against Djokovic.


Get a reality check - this guy is being talked about for a reason, not just one tournament he is physically still capable for, while the others are falling apart at this time of year - yet Murray has played a hell of a lot more than Federer this year, and only marginally less than Nadal.


So what?? The only numbers that matter are 16 for Federer and 0 for Murray!!!

Posted by Matt - Allez, Roger! Come on, Serena!

Tina,


yes I'm aware it's 45. I corrected myself but i guess my post didn't follow through.


as SW put it, the only number of any significance is 16 vs 0. 'Nuff said


ok we all know murray only win because federer and nole didn´t play and nadal had a I dont know bad day? bad season?...whatever


Last week I praised the virtues of Murray following the Djokovic lead and playing almost exclusively to the Nadal backhand to win in Tokyo. This week I become a little more circumspect since Mr. Murray did not beat Nadal, Djokovic nor Federrer to win his Shanghai masters. All credit to his fellow finalist the ever determined but always doomed David Ferrer, but Murray's victory in today's final changes nothing. The four Major finals this year featured 3 players (no name dropping necessary), and these 3 players are still my favorites to win Majors next year.


I have two reasons for my assertions:


Reason#1: The Rogers Cup final (Murray v. Djokovic)
Murray wins via Djokovic default. A win is still a win, right? WRONG! The most telling detail about that match to me was a comment made by Darren Cahill on ESPN. Cahill informed listeners that Murray and his Camp felt confident coming into the final because they'd glimpsed that Djokovic was not physically 100%. What's wrong with that intel, you ask? Nothing except when you realize that the only way Murray and his camp could feel confident about beating Djokovic is if they knew prior to the match that he wasn't feeling fine physically. This tells me that Murray is essentially an opportunist, it tells me that if Murray had to generate his own confidence to win a Major his chances of doing so is zero--if U doubt this observation just look at his results in 3 Majors final so far.


Reason#2: 2011 U.S. Open semifinal (Murray v. Nadal)
The TRUTH is in the puddin' folks. My memory is bit hazy on this one, but what I remember goes like this: it's in the middle of the third set, Nadal has just broken Murray and as he did thru the entire match Murray upped the ante on negative body language, verbally chastising himself and tugging at his shorts as if it were the cause of his uninspired performance. As if his behavior wasn't strange enough; Murray in the middle of Nadal's service game switched all his attention to his racquet as if he'd discovered the culprit of his lackluster play; Murray dashed over to his bag with no warning and started looking for a performance enhancing racquet. Needless to say, after he found a racquet suitable to his liking, he did not play any better in the match. Nadal quickly rifled off straight points to win his service game. The match was not too far behind.


What I took from this strange interlude was the realization that despite his accomplishments as pro--Murray's mindset is that of a junior player. It is remarkable to me how no one close to him has been able to make it clear to him that his body language and verbal outbursts are his biggest liability on court and against the big 3 players this liability becomes insurmountable especially at the Grand Slam Stage.


In fairness to Mr. Murray I have to point a finger at the tennis establishment that crowned him next Major contender: Why do we all feel that Murray should have won a Major by now? Is it because Murray himself said so or is it because the tennis intelligenstia hyped Murray and promised fans that he was the next great one. Frankly, I feel that Andy Murray has not misrepresented himself to fans, it is the fans and the establishment who have insisted that Murray become someone he is not. Think about it.


Please give it rest with the Andy Murray hype. He'll never win a major. He's too weak mentally. He's also a total disgrace to tennis (almost on par with Serena) with all the F-bombs, histrionics, and incessant whining to Mum in the box.


***murray does like a bit of a cry up to mummy in his box...i think itd be better if she wasnt at his next major semi or final....he needs to man-up but hes v close to mum and she is a tennis coach in her own right so he sees her as the ideal mum/coach/crying step he wrongly still thinks he needs....but he is 24 not 17/18/19 it is time to grow up.


Murray does not "cry up to mummy in his box." He yells and shouts at whoever is in his box, whether 'mummy' is there or not.


Emmanuel,


"The four Major finals this year featured 3 players (no name dropping necessary), and these 3 players are still my favorites to win Majors next year."


Name dropping necessary as Murray was a finalist at AO and I'm sure you meant the other top 3 in your group above. In fact when it's all said and done Murray had a better GS season (F-S-S-S) than Federer (S-F-Q-S), and let's not talk about the rest of the tournaments.


Otherwise, good post (although it was Cincinnati finals, not Rogers Cup in Montreal, where Murray beat Djokovic).


I'm a Federer fan myself - but the tunnel-vision of die-hard fed fans is ridiculous. Who is comparing 16-0? we're arguing whether Murray would have won if Djokovic and Federer were playing - it was a bit of a daft statement given Andy's defended the title which he won by beating Federer and the fact he's the only person who's come close to if not beating Djokovic at a Masters this year. You can't counter-argue how many grand slams each has won as it's totally irrelevant to this argument.


If you want to talk Grand Slams, Federer choked big time at the US Open against Djokovic, so don't tell me he's still the player he once was.


Get a grip and a reality check - we're not in 2006 anymore - things have moved on. Djokovic and Murray are the present and future of tennis - get used to it.


Good to see that Murray has learned to control his agrression and temper. But the point here again would be- can he do it in front of Federer/Nadal/Djoker?That will be the question for him if he wants to move ahead in rankings even further:http://bit.ly/qhjpaO


ep - agree that mummy should stay home next time. I mean after all, it hasn't been working with her there, so why not change things and see what happens?


also, I noticed that brad gilbert coached three players named andy (well the first was andre), each of whom was helped enormously by him and then fired him. I guess he's tough to get along with, but then again, I bet AM would have won a major by now if he'd stuck with bg. I think he should bring him back and dump mum.


***murray n gilbert didnt get on..or murray didnt like gilberts relentless abrasive in yer face approach, he used to talk at andy rather than to him. murray has gone thru alot of coaches already.


yeah they didn't get on, but I sort of recall he played better when gilbert coached him. I think he's a very good tactician - as a player and a coach, gilbert is annoying but gets results.


**federer cant be bothered about andy taking his no3 rank, i mean he knew by not playing shanghai he defo lose 600pts, i dont think he had injury niggles tho he just wanted a break...hmmm, federer world no4..sounds weird.


i can see gilbert...andy u listen to me dude, u gotta do this maan, r u listening maan, u gotta hang tuff, stop bitching an being a wuss, if u wanna win u gotta get mean baby, u wont win no major eating no pizza maan, u gotta wise up dude, u gotta u gottta andy andy, u listening to me maaan hey andy ANNNDYYYYY..


Can't wait for clay season...2012...

Posted by Matt - Allez, Roger! Come on, Serena!

P,


You know how it is with us Fed fans; as soon as anybody attacks our man, we go into defense mode. It's our natural inclination to avoid Roger's inevitable decline. But you're right, the Grand Slam count is utterly irrelevant in this argument. Thanks for straightening us out.


"TennisFan10 10/16/2011 at 09:01 AM
Congrats to Murray! He was lucky he wasn't playing Djokovic or Federer in the final, or he would have lost pretty easily, in my opinion. He needs to do better."


I think it's pretty unfair to knock Murray on this account. He annihilated Nadal, his nemesis and the #2 in the world, in the Tokyo final, winning 12 of the last 14 games and handing Rafa the single worst set defeat of his entire career (Nadal only won 4 points in the 3rd set, getting bagelled 6-0). That alone is impressive. Never mind he played hihgh level tennis 18 of the last 21 days and won every single match.


I too would like to see better body language from Andy, but there's no knocking he's cleaned up his competition this fall.


Here's hoping Djokovic is healthy for Paris and London. Man I wish he'd not played Davis Cup.


Topboy,


You are right of course about the dates and the events. I stand corrected here. Also you're right, I seem to have overlooked his Aussie final. Him and Fed made two finals appearances in 2011.


I was not trying to knock Murray. My point is can he "annihilate" Nadal, Djoker or Fed at a Grand slam. All evidence suggest that he can't. We all know that anyone can beat Fed, Djoker and Nadal at 3 sets tournament, but beating them at 5 sets tournaments is a whole different ball game.


I'd love to see Murray do it. I feel for the guy.


That's all I'm saying.


Fed has 1,500 points to defend in a few weeks, he is not at stolkhom (-250
0or in Asia...prbably to rest and prepare. Not knocking him he's amazing but I'd be surprised if he retained the title in London.


P: "Djokovic and Murray are the present and future of tennis - get used to it."


Fed may be not the same but he was and still a superior player. And he is doing it with ease.
On the other hand it obvious that Djokovic and Murray have to work extremely hard to get where they are. You cannot stay there for too long. Nadal is an example. So, next year Djokovic and Murray will get where they belong. If Fed hangs on there, they all will fall like overripe fruits.


**fall like overripe fruits..u mean next year you think its gonna be all federer n maybe del potro ?.


englishpeter, you see the Murray’s face. What does it tell you? The guy worked extremely hard lately. Can he do it indefinitely? No way.


I think it´s finaly time for one of the Grand Slams to be played indoor on a fast to semi-fast surface and with a LOW BOUNCE! There are sooooooo many players that are in a gigantious and unfair disadvantage because they have played most of their upbringing indoors because of the climate!


Why should all the Grand Slams be played outdoors with its slow surface and very high bounce??!! It benefits some players (read: all the claycourters etc.)in a really UNFAIR way! Indoor-tennis, with its perfect conditions (no wind, no sun, fair temprature provides the best tennis (because of its perfect conditions.


I remember last years semifinal-match (Paris Masters) between Robin Soderling vs Michael Llodra; one of the best matches of the year (if not the best) becuase of the different styles that clashed. Soderling´s baseline (which 99,9999999% of all the players play) and Llodra with his fantastic net-rushing-attacking-tennis!


So PLEASE, make one of the Grand Slam-tournaments an indoor-event with a fast surface with LOW bounce!!!!!!!!!!


wait people said that the number of slam s is inconsequential to this topic ok fine how about this murray 8 masters titles fed 17 fed still trumps murray in the masters department


How about this: Even though Murray might have beated Fed in the rankings, he cannot still beat him in a GS! Federer will always be no.1 for hsi fans no matter the rankings: For federerfans: http://bit.ly/nUKaLC


View the original article here

Shanghai Journal: 10/12

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota




Always have and always will love me some JC Ferrero. So happy to see him winning. He still looks pretty good to me.

Sad he has to play Ferrer next since these guys seem to be so close. One is often watching the other play. Too cute.

Am I being overly critical or are the Shanghai fans so new to watching tennis that they don't know any of the customary courtesies? I thought sitting in the top of Ashe during the US Open was awful with the constant talking and walking around but that doesn't affect the players as much as it does the fans. The attendants in Shanghai let anyone in at anytime and the fans don't seem to realize they are distracting the players. What's worse....was watching yesterday when someone with credentials came in during play. Felt sorry to Mohamed Lahyani....no one seemed to be listening to him. Now that this rant is over......

It was great to see JCF winning! I have missed him on the tour!

Talking about Sampras and Federer, here is a good one:
http://bit.ly/nQAplv (Federer, Sampras and Emerson-The Myth of Invincibility)

Makes you realise that noone including Nadal and Djoker can remain invincible!

**so what if fans come in during points..the players are too precious they should get on with it and stop moaning. they are wanting fans to watch and they have a go at them. empty stadiums arnt great...at least the crowd was alot bigger for rafa/wafa...maybe the fans wearnt keen on watching the 1st rd when top 8 seeds wernt playing.

@Chris -
Is that really your name ?
Time and again on these blogs' comments I have seen some random name that makes some one-liner connection to a topic and points with a link to the same blog. Even the sense of language is the same. The name is different.

Are you just one person trying to use this as a place to do some indirect advertising for your blog to get some page-hits ???

In case of the remote possibility thata you ARE Chris and a genuine person who happened to use the same language to point to the same blog as others, without any selfish interest, except to point us readers to an opinion you liked, I apologize.

*** mono-chris or multi-chris. just who is the real chris ?????.

For the second day in a row, it's Ferrero fan-club time on here :) I said it yesterday, I'll say it again - I've been watching tennis for 15 years now, and Juanqui is my absolute favourite. The day he finally does go away will be a truly sad one. Agree about a shame he's playing Ferrer - David might come up one letter short in the surname department, but I fear he may out-mosquito the Mosquito. Wasn't it Ferrer who finally ended JCF's amazing South American clay circuit run last year in Acapulco, after JCF had one their previous final?

if ferrero bts ferrer without the o, he prob be top50 again...whoooo.

No comment on the tight Raonic/Ferrer match?

Milos at least looks good after returning from injury.

I enjoy Jason Goodall much more than the Doug Adler. Very eloquent.

I agree about Ferrero, on all counts. And I've seen him beat Nadal three times during Nadal's best years, showing he still has the tactical smarts of a top player. Long live Juan Carlos! A gentleman's player, for sure.

Goodall does a fine job, as do Adler and Koenig. It's funny when Sam Gore gets mixed in there with Robbie. Come to think of it, Sam's voice quality is similar to Jim Courier's and Goodall's (or am I mixing up Jason with Doug?). Sometime,s it takes me a while to figure out which is which.

The bit about Jason Goodall was clever. But what happened to the absolutely best part of it: "like any other veteran commentator who must rise to the occasion..."? I was laughing out lout when I read it. But Tignor maybe thought it was a bit too stingy and edited it out?

I thought I was alone in liking Goodall and Koenig. I'm glad I'm not. I like them together, working off each other. I keep hearing about how Robbie is biased in favour of Nadal but even if he is, which I'm not at all sure about, it doesn't seem major. Jason Goodall may go in for stock phrases, in fact they both do, but I enjoy Jason's occasional snarkyness too. Adler I'm less keen on, he seems very enamoured of his own opinions and with less humour.

I agree with Northernboy : Milos did very well, considering he is just back from a nearly 6 months interruption ! Welcome back, Milos !

the homepage title for this was thoughts from afar. never before noticed that afar=rafa backwards. how about that for a completely irrelevant fact?

"He's drawn first blood--almost"--ha ha,I think that's going to run through my head every time a BP comes up from now on! Rafa definitely has a tendency to tighten up on those second-serve BPs, but I don't think it's unique to him. Seems pretty common among players--they're either too conservative and end up hitting a floaty return into the middle of the court (Rafa, often), or, feel pressure to make something happen and smother it into the net (e.g. Roger). One (unfortunate) difference I've noticed this year in Rafa's game is that he's often tensing up on BPs against. Last year he saved so many he joked he was a "specialist"; this year, he's been giving a lot away with nervous UFEs and even some DFs. All part of the game, I guess.

Really enjoying these Shanghai journals, btw!

Steve...your posts are so poetic and beautiful,I don't need to go to Shanghai (or wherever) to see the match.I get satisfied just reading your *notebook* or *random thoughts*

But tell me this...do you get disappointed at so few *comments* when you pen your thoughts *for-the-world* at large?
And Mr.Bodo randomly posts those Around The World In 1000words and he gets a 1000comments,which are mainly absurd.Unfair,right?ya,I think so too.

Steve,can you pass on this message to the ATP commentary-team?Which is:"Please,please show yourselves on TV"
I so badly want to put a face to their wonderful,beautiful,fantastic commentary.I simply ADORE the guys.Robby's nasal accent...my,my,my...I like that!

And can you dedicate a post to Goodall,Gore,Keonig and Adler?Like who are they?Are they family-guys?Where are they all from?If they are so good just talking-tennis...how come they never went far,playing tennis?And do they like their *dream jobs*? OR do they crib,sulk and complain like the ATP players,about long year,long flights,and having to sit court side,and all else that come with being ATP staff/employees? I hope not.

I'm writing this as I'm watching Lopez V/S Berdych and boy,I cannot stop thinking about *Deliciano* and how yummy(handsome actually) he really is!But how can you blame Judy,right?If her son is shabby,un-kept and un-tidy,she better pick another guy!Hmmmmm.
And Lopez's serve and volley is simply aweeeeesome.

Tallboyslim,

That blog link is posted by one APEKSHA too,who comments here,occasionally.Or is Apeksha and Chris same?

Crazy and weird...

"He smells first blood?"

anyone is better than Luke "toppy lob!" Jensen

"He had gone through his usual series of poses—testy, sullen, surly, glum—and finished in exhausted resignation."

Lol. Pretty much sums up every Verdasco match, eh? :)

Love your write-ups, Steve. Something to look forward to every day. Thank you.

I'm pretty sure intentionally missing a first serve break point down against Nadal is a bad idea.

Nadal is out...maybe there was something wrong...

I liked this summation of the day!

Long Live Juan Carlos! You are my hero - the breakthrough for Davis Cup for Spain - nobody can take that away from you! Juan Carlos forever!

All Novak has done so far in this year is fantasic with only Roger Federer being able to beat him at an incredibly high quality match. Rafa is here to stay only if he is able to play at the somewhat higher level. He is a hussler, competitive athlete with great skills. Vamos Rafa!


View the original article here

Shanghai: Mayer d. Nadal

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Congrats to Florian! Rafa will bounce back.

Fernando says no surprise. We do not expect much from the Bull after the Open- same result as last year in shanghai.The Bull is tired.

To those of you (Federinas who are mortified of Rafa taking over as GOAT) who think that the Locker room has found something, i.e, the Djoker playbook - pound the Rafa BH to get the short ball and then open up the FH - you are all sadly mistaken.

We will rest regroup win either paris or barclays and next year The Bull will dominate the tour. I am fernando

Fernando likes to make bold statement. He is Fernando.

Not so fast w/ the GOAT talk.

Whether or not this match "matters" or has baggage is basically all down to how Nadal reacts to it. As Fernando rightly notes, the post-Open season is NOT where Nadal shines, and in fact, he has lost no points here because he matched last year's performance.

So, he (and we) can chalk it up as par for the season and move on, or, he can take it as another worrying loss in a growing string and let it weigh on him. Up to him.

Match that Rafa should've won??? Well I was actually watching the match and Mayer was the superior player from start to finish. Close 1st set, but after holding nerves he finished dominating, he was always going to win this. Match point should be youtube'd, so should some other great rallies. Otherwise, clearly not Nadal's best day, but he player Florian Mayer today, and he was always going to beat this today. So... the man who should have won... WON! :)

Nadal was dissapointing in the second set but ublike that match against Dodig I ouldn't say he should have won it.

In the first set they both played well and Mayer's serve was working great, under a closed roof I might add which made things a bit easier for him. He closes it out in a tie-break, after having an excellent record this season in them.

In the second set Nadal had chances to get to break points and thats where he was dissapointing.

In the end it wasn't a good performance by him on an indoor hard court but thats hardly a shock. Hes reached the final of two hard court masters and a slam final on hard courts this year. Better than most of his seasons.

I don't think he is playing great at the moment and mentally needs some confidence but perhaps he just needs a break and you can never count him out at the world tour finals. The Davis cup may be all he needs at the end of the year to set him up for the AO, which I'm sure from hi comments he already has an eye on.

Rafa's stuggling, but look at the end of the year: Davis cup-Spain wins,
Paris-Nadal can recover there and he's a runner up in London. Federer has one title this year and your bashing on Rafa?.

"We do not expect much from the Bull after the Open"

"We will rest regroup win either paris or barclays"

So pleased to see that winning Paris or barclays (WTF) isn't expecting much:))

I am Federina:) But I should add not in the slightest worried about Rafa taking over as GOAT, just as I do not believe that Roger is GOAT. Because there is no GOAT. For me Roger is MEAT - Most Enjoyable of All Time.

To Rafa fans, bad luck. To Florian's fans, really well done. I haven't seen any of Rafa's matches since the Open, but to me he looks out of sorts, not just tired.

Caroline, love the MEAT comment ! LOL

I'm a huge Rafa fan but I agree he does look out of sorts.

His head isn't screwed on right and Nole did that to him. I think that until he gets a big win over Djokovic he won't have his confidence back.

Oh yeah, where's the tough guy look now, Rafa?

Did not like the bully expression when Mayer was down (and at that point possibly hurt) before the tie-break. Did not see any of that when Mayer delivered the moral victory, remained good sport. Strange from Rafa, competition is getting into his head more and more, better keep his cool. Also, what's with an entire minute between two points? Should've received a warning.

I say Fernando has a federer problem. He sees ¨federinas¨ everywhere!!

@Caroline,

It doesn't surprise me that your a federer fan, givin that you made fun of nadal when he cramped up in one of his press conferences. Also like stated in a previous posts nadal usually doesnt do well after the us open up untill the world tour finals and onward. So his lost today is pretty insignificant.

On a side note any wedding plans soon, and when do u think you'll win your first major title.

Caroline,
Like the creativity with the "MEAT" tag and wholeheartedly agree, but gotta say, I can never bring myself to say "Roger Federer is my MEAT" - That's just too creepy and weird on multiple levels... :)

Caroline: Liked this MEAL phrase

Fernando: Stay cool, a lot more disappoints are coming your way

Myself: Great buddy. Spot on. Let them lick their wounds

MEAT. Love it.

Now, just gotta work out an acronym using TOAST.

Umnn, Totally Outttasight Astounding Super Tennis.

Nah.

Although not a Rafa fan, it's sad to see him being crushed like this after a year like 2010. To all fan bashers, give it up. All tennis players play their heart and souls out there no less so than the top 3 who have booked themselves imortality in the tennis archives through their various accomplishments. Enjoy the tennis and don't slag eachother off.

Fernando gives us hope........

I've always thought MEAT stood for

Most Endangered Arrogant Tennis player

Even on a chilly, rainy Autumn morning in New England, I enjoy watching Mayer because he always brings to mind the Caffe Florian in Venice.

But I would definitely say that when I started watching the match at 4-all in the first set, that was already quite a "Shanghai Surprise". But to the comment a @10:41, Rafa was hardly "crushed".

***mayer deserved to win..it was even until tie break nadal was 4-2 up and lost the set, then was swept away more or less in second.

Posted by Bobbio 10/13/2011 at 10:08 AM
"Rafa's stuggling, but look at the end of the year: Davis cup-Spain wins,
Paris-Nadal can recover there and he's a runner up in London. Federer has one title this year and your bashing on Rafa?."

But Rafa is the one who played and lost this match...not Roger.So who should we be discussing?

***what about FART.... federer alltime racquet titan.

Bone-- I think Ed meant that the Dodig match was one Rafa should have won, not this match (though the sentence is a bit vague).

This result is meaningless. Rafa is injured and tired. He shows up at these tournaments for a lot of ungrateful fans when he should be resting. He is the most unselfish player I've seen in ages.

Serve, I think you are confusing me with another Caroline:) but I will answer your questions. I made my wedding plans 30 years ago, it was a lovely day and I'm still happily married to the same husband. I am 100% certain I will never win a Grand Slam title.

TMFunk - nice to 'see' you. MEAT *is* slightly kinky:) I was thinking of my favourite posts of the year recently. Your daughter's won my top prize. !!!!**))))^^^^ or something along those lines, wasn't it. My other favourite was a recent one of Arun's which was *

englishpeter

Final Alltime Racket Titans

Oh and a PS, Serve - I never make fun of or abuse Rafa or his fans or indeed any other players and their fans. I have been a *tennis* fan for a very long time. I admire Rafa and his achievements.

If you want to abuse my favourite player or me ... whatever floats your boat. I won't be reciprocating.

congrats to murray for winning 3 starights titles in asia,he he goes to the end of the season unbeaten

It's interesting that Nadal fans have begun the "chalking" process now that Nadal isn't as dominant anymore, whether he's tired, doesn't do well after the Open, injured, the other player played the best match of his life, etc.

Take a page from Federer fans. It's ok. It happens as players get older and lose the mystique they once had. I'm sure he'll be just fine.

Lastly, the locker room has always know to pound the Rafa bh to get the short ball, it's nothing new. The issue before was to be able to do it throughout the whole match. But as loses keep mounting to the likes of Dodig and Mayer, the other players will have more confidence going in that they have a shot and that's the real issue - much like what has happened to Fed.

Caroline, don't give up hope. I'm still polishing my victory speech for that first major title.

But back on topic. While Rafa has not been as rock solid as we've come to expect, it's probably a mistake to make too much of this loss, or any single loss. One thing I do think is true is that his aura of invincibility has been dented and so he may have to work harder to win some matches than in the past, when opponents may have just decided that it wasn't possible. It now looks possible.

Also, looks like Mayer played outstanding tennis and took advantage of his opportunities. Credit where due.

Dodig and Mayer aren't normally classified as big servers.

It's not like Nadal lost to #300. Mayer is what #15? I was surprised as he is such an unassuming person that he is often overlooked as any kind of threat to the top guys. Hey wait a minute.He is one of the top guys...:))

I don't believe there is a "greatest of all time"...there may be the most successful, the most determined..the most consistent but the greatest is arguable....it is all relative to the players on tour and the generation

Jimmy conners has 106 titles Roger has 67? does that make him greater..could be argued but wont cause Roger has 16 slams.....Rafa has only 10 so far but is the only player in the game to win six tournaments in a row..and his wins over federer are 18-9..does that make him greater?

Its all nonsense...they are all accomplished athletes...I only wish I had tenth of the talent and drive to be that successful

Year-end fatigue, personal family problems, court not suitable for play, likely to get injury if he shows his class, getting older, opponents know how to tackle the once feared player - these are some of the problems that are constantly nagging the present world number 2 Player - Rafael Nadal.

For the new generation of players, coaches are there to enable them to show the weakness of the popular and leading players in Tennis.

Time is coming when the King of Clay Court will slowly show signs of his weakness and fade away - like so many great players in the past.

After all, one cannot expect a player to win all the matches and remain unconquered in Tennis for ever during his playing days.

Sooner or later, a day will come when a top ranking player has to say adieu and let the younger generation to hold the center stage attraction.

ON a further note about Rafas performance.....I'm a fan but the writing was on the wall from the beginning......Rafas serve has deserted him all year..and it started very early on in the match...its needs to become a priority now...and a weapon....and his return of serve in this match was horrendous....if he didn't float it back short them he hit into the net.....Florian was good but by no means overwhelming....Rafa was in the lead 4-2 in the tiebreak and lost his serve twice on crucial points

Rafa had many chance in the first and second set when the it was love-30 with florian serving and then he would make errors again and again and hand the game back to mayer....Rafa handled Raonic who was a bigger server in tokyo..............but Kudos to Mayer who mixed it up and ultimately frustrate Rafa...and I noticed he.also he has taken a page from the Novak/Andy book
and pounded his forehand consistently to Rafas until he wore it out

I don't agree with the others that this is a typical end of year loss after watching the match...and even Nadal said "this was a tough loss" for him....the answer is clear that..it wasn't that he was tired or worn out..it was simply that he didn't capitalize and made lots of errors..and was beaten by a more aggressive player.....essentially he didn't have the answers for Mayers game...I think Mayers was good but not great..it was Rafas to lose and he did......I believe Rafa should go back into training and rest til the world finals...he doesn't have any more points to defend..take a rest!!

Isnt it inevitable that the person who was great at one time succumbs down to new people and fades away! but that still doesnt take away the fact that Nadal is a great warrior and will definitely bounce back!
I read this article on myth of invincibilty and as we have seen in case of Nadal too that no one can remain invincible be it Sampras, Federer or Nadal!
Here enjoy and read:http://bit.ly/nQAplv

jimmy connors won lots of tiny tournaments and not enough majors, so thats that.

Rafa is the greatest, he can cast some pearls.

Fernando is Fernado no? LOL. If Rafa gets tired now at 25 years old (his prime) after the USOPEN every year, man I don't want to see his matches during the same time later on in his career. He will be bullied even worst than today. I mean it will be very embarrasing. I'm hoping not because it's always hard to see a great champ get beaten badly.

Look I think there are a couple of things that explain Rafa's recent losses. First, joker has figured out and showed everyone how to beat him. Second, now that everyone's got the joker's playbook, Rafa is under more pressure more often... i.e. opponents don't give him as many unforced errors as he used to get before so he is having to work harder. Third, Rafa is trying to make adjustments to his game so he is making more unforced errors than he used to; Rafa is trying to hit flatter more penetrating and agressive shots. I believe it is right in trying to be more agressive becasue if he doesn't, he will continue to slip in the rankings, especially as he gets older and is more even physically with his opponents. Rafa's game is soooo physical that he just won't cut it whenever he is not physically superior to his opponents. It is a good thing he is trying to make adjustments to his game now so he can last longer at the top of the rankings.

I wonder when tennis writers will finally let go of this narrative that Nadal is invincible and any upset has more to do with his lack of form than the opponent's great play. Of course, this might bring into question Nadal's overall competence on hard courts, and no one wants that kind of heresy over here, right? Also, Ed, I am pretty sure it's your job to know that Mayer was #15 seed.

Congrats to Florian on the biggest win of his career. He showed amazing class today!

Congratulations to Mayer ! It is not that easy to win the last points when you play against a top seed as Nadal ! Mayer did it : cheers to him ! Good also to see volley-serve coming back with him, reminding Pete Sampras way of playing ! One day, a post-Rafa/Roger time will come and may be serve/volley will come back, at least on hard court and grass. Shangaï shows there are many talents in the top 50 ; good news for tennis ! A final remark : what a nice way of ending a match, a large smile and a good shake-hand to one's opponent with no shouting and any fuss ! Thanks Florian !

The man makes errors and at crticial times at that. It is true that Novak has gotten to him and his confidence isn't all there until he beat Novak. It will happen IMO and when it does he'll be playing better. It is good if he is trying to change his game,hit flatter balls and not too many shorter ones but he'll will be losing some matches as he goes through those adjustments.

Rafa is mentally broken because of Djokovic. This is where Rafa and Roger are different. Roger has the all-time record of slams, 5 year end titles, 237 cons. weeks #1, 285 total weeks #1, and numerous other records. These stats dull the pain of all Federer losses and unfortunaltely Rafa still has much left to prove and that makes his losses much more meaningful. Roger Federer knows he is the GOAT even though he would never say it (he believes it!), and that is why it seems like losses roll off his back.

MEAT, FART, TMF, Fed Express, Maestro... they're all good :)

Oh and Fernado is my hero! LOL!!! He's funny

***why does rafa seem a bit thick when managing his schedule...he always plays more matches than others, he never seems to lighten his tournament load.

Rafa has won more matches this year than any other ATP player --- yes, the guy is really a mess...

"Rafa has only 10 so far but is the only player in the game to win six tournaments in a row"

Not sure what this comment is referring to. Rafa hasn't won 6 slams in a row, nor has he won RG 6 times in a row. And if you just mean 6 tournametns in a row, Djokovic won 8 in a row this year as I recall - Australian Open, Dubai & Doha, IW & Miami, Belgrade, Madrid and Rome.

Rafa keep your focus, its just a glitch, you still have it, no one doubts that!

***eh ?...federer won dubai before aust open.

Posted by Tim (Karma King, My Posts Pack Power!)

all these justifications for another dismal Moonpie loss and the spin is like watching a spokesperson for a politician after they make a gaffe ... hilarious!

its so obvious now the GOATness of Federer, for he could never ever lose a match without a huge fuss, and headlines of decline ... Rafa's losses being ignored or justified or dismissed speaks volumes ...

i LOVE the MEAT idea Carolyn, in that standard, Fed is by far the GOAT lol ... i can barely watch 10 minutes these days without getting bored, sans the third set of Murray's final, which was fun to watch, so rare to see ...

Nadal shall have a very hard task ahead if he expects to win 6 more majors. This competition is catching up to him quickly. Now that Djokovic has made the outline to winning against Nadal, expect the field to exploit him until he make significant adjustments. I know he and Toni say it is just minor changes that are needed, but lets get real here, his problems are more than just confidence issues at the moment. One thing that has to be improved is his serve and the depth of his groundstrokes. No way will he be getting away with just spinning the serve in at high percentages against the top players anymore, especially like he does on clay. He also gives away too much ground on his groundstrokes. Even with his incredible amount of topspin, a ball landing at the service line or a little further will put him in a defensive situation that is insurmountable against Djokovic and Murray who have the ability to hurt you on both wings. He just tends to have one laps in a rally where the ball is just hit too short in the court.

Rafa will find a way to come back! He is too good not to! He is also the smartest player out there, look how he figured how to play on all the surfaces. To hae 10 Grand Slams by the age of 25 is incredible! Vamos Rafa!

I see some excuses for Nadal being ´tired`, but if so, He flew to mexico(?) for an exhibition match between 2 tournaments. And he has been complaining against the schedule of ATP tournaments???? Face it: he´s done and after losing the #1 spot to Djokovic, he fell apart....

Posted by Tim (Karma King, My Posts Pack Power!)

lets dig for those excuses ... i like the 'tired' one the best ..

A year to forget? The guy has played ten finals, including 3 in the slams.

As I expected, here we have the old buzzards on roadkill scenario. Honestly, how can some of you posters call yourselves tennis fans?
To my friends here - Greetings from Nizhny Novgorod!

Posted by Tim (Karma King, My Posts Pack Power!)

geez richard, are Yankees fans NOT baseball fans because they like to see the Red Sox go down?? geez ...

@ atptennis2012 I somewhat agree with you. Federer has the best self-belief. And, as Nole and Rafa have illustrated this year, self-belief is a huge part of tennis. Fed still thinks he can get gold at Wimbledon in singles. At times I think he's almost delusional, but hey, it's worked for him thus far. I disagree with the GOAT thing, though. I love the MEAT thing, but "All Time" is a strong statement, especially if people are basing this off of Grand Slam titles. I'm certain unless the world or tennis as we know it ends, someone will surpass 16 GS titles. If it's during all of the Fed fans' lifetimes, this is surely going to sting and make their biggest GOAT argument null and void. So... everyone should appreciate their favorites but not get too hung up on the GS count. Especially how in the past nobody even bothered to go to AO and WTT caused people like Borg(!) to skip the FO. Times are different - the measurements are slightly different.

Tim

sssssssss why don't you say that about Fedex than he even didn't want to play in Asia?

rafa did win a major, two masters series and is in wtf and davis cup final...hardly decline of the century.

Tim - Good point, but in that Yankees/Red Sox scene, the buzzards went down, and hard, shortly after the roadkill! Which was worse?

I'm just a crank who enjoys the sport of tennis and can't find anyone amongst the players to root against!

***borg played aust open once, connors twice, mcenroe not till he was 24..the majors were still majors back then so its their fault they didnt play for whatever reason...borg could have done withwinning the u.s open but was runner up 4times..too bad.

I think there is something chronically wrong with Nadal's legs: knees, feet, something.

This is not a fit Nadal, and it shows. He is playing high risk tennis more often these days, and it is a testament to how awesome a player he is that he can still cruise through most rounds at the the slams, and on clay.

But I really can't help feel that he is injured and is hiding it. I see no other reason why he struggles so much to cover ground like he used to.

Fatigue might be what he cites, but I think it is an injury. Caused by his own doing playing the way he did all those years on hard courts -- 15 feet behind the baseline, playing defense almost exclusively.

Still, good for Mayer. It is always good to beat someone like Nadal


To put it in perspective, I am a huge Federer fan, dislike Rafa's game even though it is very effective, and do not like that (as a fan) that Federer has a mental-block/big losing record against Nadal. In some perverse way I feel good when Nadal loses in slams because he cannot get close enough to Federer's tally to get the nod of being the best ever given the huge edge in their H2H rivalry. That edge is not important when it is 10 slams to 16, but becomes impossible to ignore if he gets to 13 or 14 with a few more hard court slams, and Djokovic himself gets to 8 or 9.

Roger didnt played Monte Carlo, Halle, Stockholm, Shanghai.
Novak didnt played Monte Carlo, Queens, China, Shanghai.

Rafa played Monte Carlo, Queens, Tokyo, Shanghai, he really need to be smarter with his schedule, his also playing Davis Cup and exhibitions in Dec, all I can figure is that given that his game its very physical he better played the most he can now that he is in his prime, not a bad strategy.

I told u all didnt I?!!!!! I said that rafa has started losing to any1... & here is the proof!!! Djokovic has exposed weaknesses in his game & people r using them!! Most importantly, players have started believing that rafa is beatable!!!! I say again, rafa now has a huge danger from right handed double handed backhand players!!! D downfall of rafa has begun!!!! Just wait & watch!!!

Nadal has not any injury and fatigue. His legs are OK and from his own words he is physically better then ever
Nadal has a mental/block, too many distractions out of the court and his prodigious mind right now is OFF.
He'll be back so some of you try don't go so fast and so glad, he is 25 years old, planty time to recover his mind and to upset you (his antis) hehe

I agree with Tyler ! Thanks for the analysis, by the way ! More and more players beat Nadal, because Djokovic showed the way and now Nadal fears being beaten. In the long run, on hard court, I think attackers should win, all things being equal. Now Nadal is a defender. His fantastic top spin is not enough any more and he sticks to it. He takes always his time, waiting for his opponent's mistake, but very seldom attacks straight on. It is his style of tennis ! And I don't think he can change that ! Besides his way of playing is physically exhausting and he has been playing for a number of years now. Don't forget also that Toni forced him to be left handed ! How does the body react to that in the long run, I wonder. Of course, he is still a great player and probably the best on clay, with the possible exception of Djokovic. The French Open will tell !

***be a laugh if the fedster n rafa/wafa won no more majors between them.

ep - nadal won fo and then monte carlo, which is a master's in name but non-mandatory, so of somewhat lower status as not all top players have to play. other title was barcelona, which is a 500. all on clay. it's a great year for most players, but a comedown for him.

While it is true that Rafa has often struggled after the USO, it is new that he has lost so many other matches before he even got there. Mostly...but not all...to a guy named Novak. It is hard to see how this portends well.

OTH, tennis, like all sport, is all about a clean slate. Every game, every match, every tournament is a chance to start over. IMO, anyone who writes Nadal off is foolish. He is a great champion and has relative youth, (if not actual tennis mileage), on his side. There is still Bercy and the WTF ahead for him to say nothing of 2012. We gonna see, no?

To Slick, who every time Nadal loses says he is tired and injured because he's invincible when he isn't, i. e., when he wins he's invincible. This is such an absurd argument that I think you must actually dislike Nadal, while pretending to be a fan. (I won't use that silly word "hater".)

Nadal did have an excellent period of all court greatness, but basically he's always been a clay court specialist who was also outstanding on grass too. To me he's the GOAT on clay. I think that is how he will be seen by history, and surely that's enough to keep anyone happy?

I agree with you Corrie. But I also really believe that Nadal is injured. And it is not an excuse for losing. I am not even a huge fan, even if I recognize him as a great player. I much rather watch Delpo or Tsonga than Nadal, for instance.

a fully fit and rested nadal who isn't playing indoors or after the us open or against djokovic, always wins

***nadal might retire like borg at 25, last major the french, last final u.s open for both...almost exactly same age june56 / june86... then again "i play always with high motivation and humble illusion no ?."

***nadal should stay with the purple garb...power to the purple.

Nadal should do the following if he has to win matches

a) Limit the number of matches he plays in a calender year
b) Have more self-belief in his shots on hard-courts
c) Flatten the shots more than going for top-spin shots close to the service box allowing the opponent to more forward
d) Change from defensive to offensive more often and do it while flattening the shots than going for the spin on the base or side lines giving less room for the opponents to respond.
e) Biggest thing is the Serve. He has to improve a lot on his serve if he wants to get some free points.
f) He is sweating a lot more than last year. two games into the match, he is already sweating.. too much tennis has taken a toll on him.

All Rafa needs is the magic 10mph grip change on his serve and everything will be back to normal?

Am I the only the one that thinks that an early loss will do Nadal some good? I know hes a guy that likes rythym and confidence but between IW and the Us open this year he only failed to make the final in 3 tournaments and one of those was queens.

I think he needs this time to rest and train hard for a change. I know he likes to keep playing mathces but if he's going to improve his serve or sharpen up his return of serve then he needs to get knocked out of tournaments early to have more time to do so.

Also, I know Bodo keeps banging on about tis with Fed but it is also true that for Nadal everything he adds right now is a bonus, he's won everything there is to win on all surfaces, and is only the secnd man to ever win at least 2 slams on each surface (Wilander was the other). He's also made it to double figures which not many have done.

My point is that he need not be some machine at the moment and dominate every tournamnt but everything he wins, or has won since the us open last year, is a bonus to his illustrious career.

***the good news with rafa losing is that he dosnt get destroyed by murray again.

***rafa is gonna be fine..the balloons are his to gawp at.


View the original article here

Shanghai: Murray d. Ebden

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

***at 3-3 the wheels fell off..oh indeed old bean, ebden came back from 0-40 on his serve to hold, but then folded like a house made out of clouds caught in a stiff breeze.

Posted by Cotton Jack (thriding)

You know your second serve is rubbish when it makes Murray's look good.

Reaching that stage of the competition is already a good result for a player yesterday unknown ! Attacking so many times the net on hard court is good news and very much in the wake of an old Australian tradition long forgotten. Even if Murray won, good luck for the future Matt Ebden ! Hope he will do well in his home country for the Australian Open !

murray is a machine right now i would love to see him in this form versus djokovic at the wtf's tht would be a match of the year candidate

It's a rare article that calls Murray's second serve good but, yeah, Ebden's certainly qualifies as a poor second serve.

"Murray is the hottest player on the tour, hands down." Really?

murray is hot when djokovic n federer arnt around and nadal has his usual end of season quiet spell.

Cotton Jack (thriding) 10/14/2011 at 01:16 PM
You know your second serve is rubbish when it makes Murray's look good.

agreed

I think it´s finaly time for one of the Grand Slams to be played indoor on a fast to semi-fast surface and with a LOW BOUNCE! There are sooooooo many players that are in a gigantious and unfair disadvantage because they have played most of their upbringing indoors because of the climate!

Why should all the Grand Slams be played outdoors with its slow surface and very high bounce??!! It benefits some players (read: all the claycourters etc.)in a really UNFAIR way! Indoor-tennis, with its perfect conditions (no wind, no sun, fair temprature provides the best tennis (because of its perfect conditions.

I remember last years semifinal-match (Paris Masters) between Robin Soderling vs Michael Llodra; one of the best matches of the year (if not the best) becuase of the different styles that clashed. Soderling´s baseline (which 99,9999999% of all the players play) and Llodra with his fantastic net-rushing-attacking-tennis!

So PLEASE, make one of the Grand Slam-tournaments an indoor-event with a fast surface with LOW bounce!!!!!!!!!


View the original article here

Shanghai: Nadal d. Garcia-Lopez

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Shanghai: Nadal d. Garcia-Lopez


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Well, well, well. probably not worth writing a RR about if i could just stroll in and be first.

Unless, it's a final, I think the RR should be on the most compelling/competitive matches of the day.

The commentators were talking about Murray's short hair and being 'freshly shaven'. Oy oy Peter Bodo shame on you - the fact please??

nadals forehand was good and the purple tennis gear was good.

wouldnt like to be murray tomorrow change of court conditions are different and the balls are different wawrinka probably isnt the first opponent you want

I appreciate the RRs, especially when the time difference is so great that there is no hope of watching the match myself. Thank you!

Enjoyed the read, Pete.

wilson75 - presumably, the RRs need to be planned as much as anything else on the site, so it's not always going to be possible to predict the most compelling matches before they happen. Even tennis writers must have to do things other than watch matches all day every day, too, with a view to writing about the most interesting results - convenience and ability to watch at certain times must play a part in deciding what to cover. As would the writers' interest in matches or one particular player in a match (I like to think this is the most important thing.) Plus, opinions are always going to differ as to what's most interesting.

Sure I would've liked to read an RR on Kei vs JWT, for example, but that's in hindsight. Looking down the OOP, deciding between world no 4 vs whatever Kei is and the ATP 2's first match after what must've been a disappointing loss on Sunday, vs someone who beat him at this stage of the year last year, I can see someone might prefer to be choosing the second.

To all who ask about how RRs are selected, jewell's comment is as good a point of reference as any. During the Slams -- and big tournaments that don't begin at 2 am EST -- we have some more flexibility, but an event like Shanghai is more difficult to tackle. Saying that, expect RRs on all the good stuff come Australia.

Also, Pete will be posting on Kei's big win later today, and Steve Tignor's newest notebook is up now. Thanks for stopping by, everyone.

Any Rafa match deserves a RR. He is the center of the tennis universe due to his excellence on and off the court. He wins this tournament, take it to the bank.

the centre of the tennis universe is playing in purple...power to the purple.

There are a great many people around the world who will click on anything and everything with the words 'Rafael' and/or 'Nadal' in the title. I am one of them.

"There are a great many people around the world who will click on anything and everything with the words 'Rafael' and/or 'Nadal' in the title. I am one of them."


Liz, LOL at your comments and may I say me too!

wish I had the Tennis Channel and could watch these matches in Asia. Still no Tennis Channel on Verizon FIOS - so unfair.

Pete....you obviously were't watching or listening to the match.....the commentators were talking about Andys look...not Rafas....Andy was right behind Rafa.....Pay attention your a tennis writer for good ness sakes!!

***murray was watching rafa/wafa n thort, if i wear all purple tennis gear then i will finally win a major (or ten).

***has rafa/wafa given up those lime green horrorfest shirts finally ?..lets hope so.

Such a cute layout! Love the quilt. I need to make one for a friend and this pattern is great

The most interesting thing about this match was the fact that Murray was in the otherwise empty crowd.

Posted by why are we still discussing this match?

View the original article here